Actually, since 2008, neither one of the game`s iterations had a playable 3D mode. Now, 3D beeing the strongest point to favor FifaM, hasn`t been substantialy improved since 2008 edition. FM has yet to achieve quality in this regard, while FifaM rely on it`s FIFA engine to simulate in 3D the match. I am a long enough player to be called conservative but still I always choose FifaM, for more than 8 years, since every year, FM dissapoints in the only reason I play a football management game: actual match simulation. The so called casul gamer rather choose FifaM, for it`s easier learning curve, better visuals and huge licensed clubs, players and competitions. The conservatives always choose FM, for it`s well known depth and complexity.
In fact only two competitors are actually fighting for supremacy, Football Manager (FM) and Fifa Manager (FifaM). I am a Football management game market is very small.
… Expandįootball management game market is very small. The teams cannot defend at all, I had a 5 man defence as PSV and still I was conceding 3/4/5 goals a match so ending up with 5-4 score lines gets very tiring very quickly. You could focus on very short, cautious passes or a different tactic of very long, direct passes but the 3D match engine gives you exactly the same results. The games are SO unbelievably unrealistic that no matter how much you change your tactics, the team plays one way. The game is majorly let down in the 3D simulation match engine. You could focus on very short, cautious passes or a different tactic of very long, direct passes but the 3D The game play overall is very good giving you a detailed, comprehensive overview of managing a club. The game play overall is very good giving you a detailed, comprehensive overview of managing a club.
0 kommentar(er)
